FAQs for Practitioners, Informational Guide for Prisoners, Training Videos, and Sample Pleadings
In People v Lockridge, ___ Mich ___ (Docket No. 149073, 7/29/15), the Michigan Supreme Court concluded that the Michigan sentencing guidelines create a mandatory minimum sentence range that violates the rule of Apprendi v New Jersey, 530 US 466 (2000), and Alleyne v United States, 133 S Ct 2151 (2013), and thus violates the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments, because the sentencing scheme uses judicial fact-finding in the scoring of the offense variables. SADO has put together important resources for practitioners and defendants to help advocate in the post-Lockridge era. Read more
View Past Stories
- DUI Defense: DUI Defense: Study Supports New Sobriety Tests For Suspected Drunk Boaters - July-August, 2015
- Public Defense Update: Michigan Indigent Defense Commission
- Reports and Studies: Magnetic Brain Stimulation Can Change How Punishments Are Imposed
- Spotlight On: Matthew M. Evans - October, 2015
- From Other States: October, 2015
- New and Interesting in the Brief Bank: October, 2015
- Surveillance News: October, 2015
- Local Success: John W. Ujlaky - October, 2015
- Circuit Court Opinion of the Month: Michigan Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA) Unconstitutional as Applied
- Legislative Update: Legislative and Policy Updates
- 12.04.2015 CAP - US Supreme Court Updat...
- 12.09.2015 SADO - Identifying, Investig...
- 01.09.2016 CDAM - CDAM’s Trial College:...
- 01.10.2016 ABA/NACDL - Advanced Crimin...
- 01.19.2016 OCBA - Anatomy of a Criminal...