Third Circuit
Third Circuit: government forfeited argument for extension of Supreme Court precedent at suppression hearing
After Mr. Dowdell was charged with gun offenses, the district court granted his motion to suppress. Mr. Dowdell was the rear seat passenger in a vehicle that was pulled over for a traffic stop. An officer opened the rear car door and saw a bulge in Mr. Dowdell’s coat and searched him, finding a weapon. The Third Circuit affirmed holding that the government forfeited, at the suppression hearing, an argument for extending Supreme Court precedent allowing an officer to order a driver or passenger out of a car during a traffic stop to allow a door to be opened. The Court emphasized that the government argued in its brief and at the hearing that it was only arguing that the officer had reasonable suspicion for opening the door. The Court reasoned that forfeiture of arguments can be enforced against the government in the same way forfeiture is enforced against criminal defendants, even when doing so does not further the purpose of the exclusionary rule. United States v Dowdell, CA 3, 06-02-23, WL 3771238.
Current Articles
- Reconciling the irreconcilable: Recent state and federal court opinions involving 2021 SORA
- Improving the agent’s description of the offense in the Presentence Report (especially when it comes to acquitted conduct)
- Summer 2025 Fellowships available through the Black Public Defender Association
- SADO is a 2024 Top Michigan Workplace
- Keeley Blanchard is the new MAACS Administrator
- The CDRC Expands!
- SADO seeks summer interns
- SADO expands to unprecedented levels
- SADO and MAACS Attorneys to argue before MSC at October session
- Opinion: Judge used legal system to mistreat a child
Subscriber Comments