Life Sentences for Youth Cases to be Heard by Michigan Supreme Court
SADO Attorneys Among those Arguing March 6, 2014
This past fall the Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to three Appellants serving life sentences for offenses committed as youths, all of whom are arguing that their sentences are unconstitutional in light of the United States Supreme Court decision in Miller v Alabama. On SADO's webpage, there is a collection of materials and links which will be updated regularly until the time of arguments in the Michigan Supreme Court. SADO Deputy Director Jonathan Sacks will be arguing on behalf of his client, Defendant-Appellant Dakotah Eliason, who was fourteen years old at the time of the offense. SADO Special Assistant Defender Pat Selby is arguing on behalf of her client Raymond Carp, who was fifteen years old at the time of his offense. SADO was also invited to participate and argue as amicus in the Carp case.
Current Articles
- Safe & Just Michigan
- Ask an appellate attorney: Would Alex Murdaugh have been granted a new trial if he had been an indigent defendant in Michigan?
- We are Hiring!
- What stability looks like in reentry
- Sentencing for horrific crimes short of murder
- SADO is hiring a General Clerk
- Social Media Matters
- Attempt penalties and other tricky research questions
- Safe & Just Michigan
- Project Reentry: Learning from each other
Subscriber Comments