Life Sentences for Youth Cases to be Heard by Michigan Supreme Court
SADO Attorneys Among those Arguing March 6, 2014
This past fall the Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to three Appellants serving life sentences for offenses committed as youths, all of whom are arguing that their sentences are unconstitutional in light of the United States Supreme Court decision in Miller v Alabama. On SADO's webpage, there is a collection of materials and links which will be updated regularly until the time of arguments in the Michigan Supreme Court. SADO Deputy Director Jonathan Sacks will be arguing on behalf of his client, Defendant-Appellant Dakotah Eliason, who was fourteen years old at the time of the offense. SADO Special Assistant Defender Pat Selby is arguing on behalf of her client Raymond Carp, who was fifteen years old at the time of his offense. SADO was also invited to participate and argue as amicus in the Carp case.
Current Articles
- Work Smarter: AI for Life after Release
- SADO attorney to participate in Michigan Supreme Court's Community Connections Program
- 2025 Project Reentry Workshops
- What sentencing judges think
- New report reviews progress made in the decade since Montgomery v Louisiana
- Safe & Just Michigan
- Ask an appellate attorney: What question do I need to ask in my statement of questions presented?
- Digital Literacy with The Friends U Need Workshop -- Tonight!
- MAACS is hiring a Voucher Review Attorney
- Ask an appellate attorney: Does the prosecutor have to disclose that a witness changed their story before the trial if they have the witness acknowledge the inconsistency at trial?
Subscriber Comments