FAQs for Practitioners after the Michigan Supreme Court Ruling in People v Lockridge
In People v Lockridge, ___ Mich ___ (Docket No. 149073, 7/29/15), the Michigan Supreme Court concluded that the Michigan sentencing guidelines create a mandatory minimum sentence range that violates the rule of Apprendi v New Jersey, 530 US 466 (2000), and Alleyne v United States, 133 S Ct 2151 (2013), and thus violates the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments, because the sentencing scheme uses judicial fact-finding in the scoring of the offense variables.
Learn how this decision affects felony sentencing in Michigan moving forward by reading Anne Yantus' Answers to Lockridge FAQs.
Current Articles
- Project Reentry: The 100% interest rate by Lorenzo Harrell
- Obligation to pay financial penalties after a conviction is set aside
- A quick SORA update for trial attorneys
- Safe & Just Michigan
- SADO attorney to argue before the Michigan Supreme Court
- SADO is hiring! Apply now!
- SADO is hiring Assistant Appellate Defenders!
- Old Chief: The solution you didn’t know you needed in aggravated stalking cases
- Michigan Supreme Court sentencing decisions, term 2025-2026
- Chelsea Richardson earns the Emerging Leader Award!
Subscriber Comments