Border Issues Brown Bag Presented by Stuart Friedman
On December 8, 2011 starting at 1:30pm we will be holding a brown-bag event at the State Appellate Defender's Office dealing with Canadian legal issues which affect our clients when they cross the Canadian border.
Canadian Immigration Attorney "Drew" Porter will speak about what is required to enter Canada when you are charged with an offense or have been convicted of an offense. Canada provides a number of waiver mechanisms, but many of them require advanced permission (or at least preparation).
Canadian Criminal Lawyer Michael Gordner will speak about the effect of a US criminal conviction once the former offender actually gets past the immigration booth. What is the effect of a US drunk driving conviction on an Ontario driver's license holder? What is the effect of a US sex offense conviction on a Canadian or a person visiting Canada? Do they have to register under Canada's SOIRA or Ontario's Christopher Law? Join us a lively discussion on these issues.
The seminar is free and tickets are available on a first come, first serve basis at http://www.eventzilla.net/web/event?eventid=201110264379. We have only thirty seats, so please cancel on line if you can't make it so that others can attend. Walk-ins are welcome, but ticketed guests will be given priority. It will be held at:
State Appellate Defender's Office ("SADO")
33rd Floor
Penobscot Building
645 Griswold
Detroit, MI 48226
Current Articles
- Work Smarter: AI for Life after Release
- SADO attorney to participate in Michigan Supreme Court's Community Connections Program
- 2025 Project Reentry Workshops
- What sentencing judges think
- New report reviews progress made in the decade since Montgomery v Louisiana
- Safe & Just Michigan
- Ask an appellate attorney: What question do I need to ask in my statement of questions presented?
- Digital Literacy with The Friends U Need Workshop -- Tonight!
- MAACS is hiring a Voucher Review Attorney
- Ask an appellate attorney: Does the prosecutor have to disclose that a witness changed their story before the trial if they have the witness acknowledge the inconsistency at trial?
Subscriber Comments