SADO and MAACS Attorneys to Argue Before Michigan Supreme Court at May Session
Arguments Scheduled for Tuesday, May 7, 2019 - Morning Session Only
SADO's Angeles Meneses and MAACS's Ronald Ambrose will present arguments to the Michigan Supreme Court on May 7, 2019 (morning session only). In People v Antjuan Pierre Jackson, Ms. Meneses will argue issues related to the scoring of OV 13. In People v Kelvin Willis, Mr. Ambrose will argue issues related to the proofs necessary for conviction of making child sexually abusive material.
People v Antjuan Pierre Jackson, Docket No. 156502 - SADO’s Angeles Meneses
The Court directed the parties to address whether the provision in MCL 777.19(1) that the sentencing guidelines only apply to an attempt to commit an enumerated offense “if the attempted violation is a felony” requires that the offense the defendant attempted to commit be a felony, or the attempt conviction itself be a felony, for purposes of scoring OV 13.
Find the Supreme Court summary of this case and the parties’ briefs here.
People v Kelvin Willis, Docket No. 157465 - MAACS’s Ronald Ambrose
The Court directed the parties to address (1) whether, to sustain a conviction under MCL 750.145c(2), the prosecution must prove that the defendant acted for the purpose of producing or making child sexually abusive material; and (2) whether the evidence in this case was sufficient to support the defendant’s conviction for child sexually abusive activity, MCL 750.145c(2).
Find the Supreme Court summary of this case and the parties’ briefs here.
Watch live streaming arguments here.
The Court directed the parties to address whether the provision in MCL 777.19(1) that the sentencing guidelines only apply to an attempt to commit an enumerated offense “if the attempted violation is a felony” requires that the offense the defendant attempted to commit be a felony, or the attempt conviction itself be a felony, for purposes of scoring OV 13.
Find the Supreme Court summary of this case and the parties’ briefs here.
People v Kelvin Willis, Docket No. 157465 - MAACS’s Ronald Ambrose
The Court directed the parties to address (1) whether, to sustain a conviction under MCL 750.145c(2), the prosecution must prove that the defendant acted for the purpose of producing or making child sexually abusive material; and (2) whether the evidence in this case was sufficient to support the defendant’s conviction for child sexually abusive activity, MCL 750.145c(2).
Find the Supreme Court summary of this case and the parties’ briefs here.
Watch live streaming arguments here.
Current Articles
- Work Smarter: AI for Life after Release
- SADO attorney to participate in Michigan Supreme Court's Community Connections Program
- 2025 Project Reentry Workshops
- What sentencing judges think
- New report reviews progress made in the decade since Montgomery v Louisiana
- Safe & Just Michigan
- Ask an appellate attorney: What question do I need to ask in my statement of questions presented?
- Digital Literacy with The Friends U Need Workshop -- Tonight!
- MAACS is hiring a Voucher Review Attorney
- Ask an appellate attorney: Does the prosecutor have to disclose that a witness changed their story before the trial if they have the witness acknowledge the inconsistency at trial?
Subscriber Comments